Gynecology Oncology
Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi; Afsaneh Tehranian; Setareh Akhavan; Elahe Rezayof; Nooshan Tajik
Articles in Press, Accepted Manuscript, Available Online from 11 May 2024
Abstract
Background & Objective: Immunosuppression, HPV persistence, and smoking are the main related risk factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) recurrence. However, age as a basic factor may be a main factor related to CIN recurrence. Therefore, our study aimed to detect the potential role ...
Read More
Background & Objective: Immunosuppression, HPV persistence, and smoking are the main related risk factors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) recurrence. However, age as a basic factor may be a main factor related to CIN recurrence. Therefore, our study aimed to detect the potential role of women's age in CIN recurrence.Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 329 patients who underwent conization in the gynecology-oncology clinics of Arash and Imam Khomeini hospitals affiliated with Tehran University of Medical Sciences between February 2016 and February 2021.Results: Totally, 329 cases were enrolled in the study. Most women were in their thirties. CIN recurrence was about 10.0% (32 cases). The CIN recurrence rate was 8.9% in women younger than 30, 10.2% in 30-40, 11.3% in 40-50, and 5.6% in 50-60 decades. There was no significant (p-value=0.802) difference in recurrence rate among age groups. There was a significant (p-value=0.023) difference in the frequency of endocervical involvement regarding age category, women aged 40 to 50 had the most frequent marginal involvement with 26.8%, while there was no significant (p-value=0.802) difference in frequency of marginal involvement regards age category.Conclusion: CIN cases with age higher than 40 years need to have more caution and tight follow-up visit after conization.
Gynecology Oncology
Afsaneh Tehranian; Akram Ghahghaei-Nezamabadi; Maryam Motiei Langeroudi; Reyhaneh Aghajani
Volume 8, Issue 1 , January and February 2023, , Pages 53-56
Abstract
Background & Objective: We compared two different methods of visual inspection of the cervix, including Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) and Visual inspection of the cervix with Lugol's iodine (VILI) in terms of sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of pre-malignant cervical ...
Read More
Background & Objective: We compared two different methods of visual inspection of the cervix, including Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) and Visual inspection of the cervix with Lugol's iodine (VILI) in terms of sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of pre-malignant cervical lesions in comparison to colposcopy guided biopsy.Materials & Methods: In this cross-sectional study, a total number of 200 women who were referred to the colposcopy clinic of Arash women’s hospital (Tehran, Iran) for cervical cancer screening, underwent VIA, VILI, and colposcopy guided biopsy during 2018-2019.Results: The calculated sensitivity and specificity of VIA and VILI in this population were (100% and 69.5%) and (100% and 60%), respectively, whereas the sensitivity and specificity of both VIA and VILI tests in combination were 100% and 77.2%. The positive and negative predictive values were 32.7% and 100%, respectively, when combined form of VIA and VILI was applied in this population.Conclusion: VIA and VILI alone or in combination could be used as screening tests to evaluate the presence of cervical cancer and in case of positive results, supplementary tests such as colposcopy guided biopsy could be performed for definite diagnosis.